Still your grandfather’s boiler

Estimating the effects of the Clean Air Act’s grandfathering provisions

By Sylwia Bialek, Jack Gregory, Bridget Pals and Richard L. Revesz in Energy Electricity United States

July 8, 2025

Notes

Published in the Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (JAERE).

See related presentations at:

Abstract

While vintage differentiation is a highly prominent feature of various regulations, it can induce significant biases. We study these biases in the context of New Source Review—a program within the US Clean Air Act imposing costly sulfur dioxide (SO2) abatement requirements on new boilers but not existing ones. Leveraging a novel dataset covering state-level SO2 regulations, we show that the regulatory differentiation decreased the probability of a grandfathered boiler retiring in a given year by 2.4 percentage points (i.e., 60% smaller) and increased their operations by around 1,150 hours annually. Conservative back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest annual societal damages of up to $2.5 billion associated with additional SO2 emissions caused by delayed retirements, higher utilization, and higher emission rates in the years considered. The results imply that long after their passage and in the presence of many subsequent, more stringent environmental policies, grandfathering provisions continued to have strong perverse impacts.

Total sulfur dioxide emissions and damage effects from NSR.

Figure 1. Total sulfur dioxide emissions and damage effects from NSR.

Notes. Back-of-the-envelope estimates for approximately 500 investor-owned-utility, commercial and industrial boilers identified as having enjoyed grandfathering status after the introduction of NSR.

Posted on:
July 8, 2025
Length:
1 minute read, 204 words
Categories:
Energy Electricity United States
Tags:
Publication Dissertation
See Also:
AMI water meters deliver end-use water and financial savings in leaky households
Markets with power
Essays on Electricity Economics